Comments on: Adidas vs. Fila

By: GT

GT — Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:27:58 +0000

i mostly wear nike Air Force Ones cause they the best looking shoes in the street, also dunks and air jordans and timberland boots. F%$k adidas superstars, cause they girly looking, and f$%k freeboks too

By: GT

GT — Mon, 16 Apr 2007 22:27:58 +0000

By: Elvis

Elvis — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 21:23:15 +0000

I have been using FILA for like three years now and the best part of them is the comfortability and the low cost
Esp. the non laced sport shoes I dont think any of them others make those.
Try it out they are great, a decent shoe should start in the range of like 1500 to 2300/- as opposed to adidas or reebok or nike.

By: Elvis

Elvis — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:23:15 +0000

By: EBREW

EBREW — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 02:52:40 +0000

Compare the prices of fila and reebok itz stunning

By: EBREW

EBREW — Sun, 21 Jan 2007 01:52:40 +0000

Compare the prices of fila and reebok itz stunning

By: Arun

Arun — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 08:46:24 +0000

I’m a Reebok loyalist myself. Average lifetime of a pair of Adidas on my feet is 4 months, 6 months for Nike. Reeboks last me a year and a half on average. Even then, I only change them coz i’m bored, not because they’re falling to pieces. I only have a single pair of sneakers at any given time so the scheme works well for me. Can’t say I’ve tried Fila yet though. Mebbe next year when its shoe changing time.

By: Arun

Arun — Tue, 28 Nov 2006 07:46:24 +0000

By: Sushubh

Sushubh — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:37:46 +0000

oh yeah
i hate those jogging shoes too…

By: PITA

PITA — Fri, 24 Nov 2006 15:29:10 +0000

try puma, converse…. or somthing alt. … adidas orignal superstars are still the best… i hate everyone coz they wear those normal runnign shoes everywhere, cmon we shud be wearing street wear shoes…